 |


|
Home - Viewing one post

BusinessWeek cannot afford to stay within McGraw-Hill


BusinessWeek is an anxious workplace. We're up for sale. Private
equity investors are kicking the tires. Many of us could be jettisoned
by Christmas, or even Hallowe'en. We even top a recent ranking (by
anonymous "experts") on the brand most likely to disappear. Naturally,
many of us wish we could stay within the safe confines of the
McGraw-Hill Companies, where the magazine was founded 80 years ago.
But
McGraw-Hill is not a safe home. The company, for all its merits, is
slow and bureacratic, and it's painfully short on innovation and
creative thinking at its highest levels. This is hardly the outfit to
remake a business for the age of Google and Wikipedia. We need owners with faster feet and bigger heads.
It is true that it
seemed to be a luxury over the last several years to be owned by a
patient investor, one who loved the brand and swallowed growing losses.
But looking back, this reduced the pressure to remake
ourselves. A sharper and more tech-savvy owner would have pressed for
transformative changes, and would not have greenlighted extravagent and ill-conceived tech
projects.
So,
McGraw-Hill, scorched by the Internet economy, dumps us and returns to
its safer businesses, including books and credit ratings, right? Well,
that's the idea. But the same forces that we confront are also
threatening those divisions. An example. At a tech roundtable this week at the
Aspen Institute, I met Jesper Andersen, co-founder of FreeRisk,
a
startup that is out to create crowd-sourced credit ratings. Will
FreeRisk topple S&P? Probably not. Most startups fail. But if
alternative approaches take root, S&P could lose its pricing power.
The same pain is inevitable in the book business. Already students are
using networks to trade and share $175 text books.
Yes, the
future for BusinessWeek is uncertain and pain is inevitable. But I'll take my chances with a
fast company driving these changes. In the end, I'm in full agreement with Terry McGraw: BusinessWeek has no future with McGraw-Hill.
|



|

|


|
 |

















Raining. Going to movies. Choosing between frivolity of Gatsby and nastiness of custody fight in What Maisie Knew...

follow me on twitter





Kirkus - Kirkus Reviews

Andrew Dunn - Bloomberg News

Culture Mob - Dan Sampson

Shelfari (Amazon) - Tom Nissley

read more reviews





Why Nate Silver is never wrong
- November 8, 2012

The psychology behind bankers' hatred for Obama
- September 10, 2012

"Corporations are People": an op-ed
- August 16, 2011

Wall Street Journal excerpt: Final Jeopardy
- February 4, 2011

Why IBM's Watson is Smarter than Google
- January 9, 2011

Rethinking books
- October 3, 2010

The coming privacy boom
- August 17, 2010

The appeal of virtual
- May 18, 2010

My next book: IBM's Jeopardy mission
- March 22, 2010

BusinessWeek's strategy
- November 12, 2009

BusinessWeek cannot afford to stay within McGraw-Hill
- August 6, 2009

How to remake BusinessWeek?
- July 16, 2009







|